Journal Article

Comparing collaborative drawing tools and whiteboards: An analysis of the group process

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Collaborative drawing tools, which are designed to allow multiple users to share an electronic drawing space, have recently become the focus of many researchers' efforts. While advances have been made in the technological implementation of these tools, little is known about the effect these tools have on group processes. This paper discusses a study that was conducted to compare groups using conventional (whiteboard) technology to those using collaborative drawing tools. The results of these two experiments provide evidence that these tools alter the way in, which groups work. For some types of tasks, the amount of interaction among group members using a collaborative drawing tool tends to be less than among groups using conventional technology. Groups using collaborative drawing tools tended to take significantly longer than whiteboard groups. Possible reasons for these results are further explored in this paper.

Description

Aytes, Kregg (1995): Comparing collaborative drawing tools and whiteboards: An analysis of the group process. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 4, No. 1. DOI: 10.1007/BF00823363. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551

Keywords

Collaborative drawing tools, group process, shared drawing space

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Load citations
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.