Collaboration as an Activity Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects
Fulltext URI
Document type
Additional Information
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
A coalition is a collaborative pattern inwhich people must work together to accomplish atask, but where organizational constraintsstand in the way of their making use of thecoordination techniques that typically enablecollaboration. Trinity is a software systemthat uses a virtual world to provide coalitionswith synthetic coordination capabilitiesfunctionally equivalent to those that occurnaturally in an organized collaboration. Thevirtual world functions as a pseudo-collective object since it plays thecoordination role of a collective object. Thedesign philosophy underlying Trinity is heavilyinformed by some of the fundamental concepts ofActivity Theory. To illustrate these ideas, wewill examine below the case of coordinatingoperational information for the coalition ofpeople who maintain the stream of data coursingthrough a securities brokerage, describingalong the way the relevant Activity Theorybackground and the architecture of the virtualworld.
Description
Keywords
Citation
URI
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Number of citations to item: 13
- Daniel Forgues, Lauri Koskela (2009): The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance, In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 3(2), doi:10.1108/17538370910971036
- Michael Twidale, Karen Ruhleder (2004): Where am I and who am I?, In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, doi:10.1145/1031607.1031671
- J. Bragge, P. Marttiin, T. Tuunanen (2000): Developing Innovative Information Systems Services Together with Wide Audience End-Users, In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2005.198
- Philippe Fauquet-Alekhine (2020): Competencies Need Actions, In: Knowledge Management in High Risk Industries, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49213-7_3
- Jörgen Skågeby (2011): Online Friction, In: Knowledge Development and Social Change through Technology, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-507-0.ch009
- Jörgen Skågeby (2009): Exploring Qualitative Sharing Practices of Social Metadata: Expanding the Attention Economy, In: The Information Society 1(25), doi:10.1080/01972240802587588
- Pooya Jaferian, Kirstie Hawkey, Andreas Sotirakopoulos, Maria Velez-Rojas, Konstantin Beznosov (2011): Heuristics for evaluating IT security management tools, In: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, doi:10.1145/2078827.2078837
- Christine A. Halverson (2002): Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1-2(11), doi:10.1023/a:1015298005381
- Daniel Forgues, François Chiocchio, Audrey Lavallée, Vincent Laberge (2017): Performance de la conception intégrée et intégration des technologies de l’information dans un contexte de travail multidisciplinaire: une étude exploratoire, In: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2(44), doi:10.1139/cjce-2011-0486
- François Chiocchio, Daniel Forgues (2008): Le rôle des objets-frontières dans l’apprentissage et la performance d’équipes d’étudiants travaillant à des projets de conception de bâtiments, In: Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire 3(5), doi:10.7202/039172ar
- Bonnie A. Nardi (2007): Placeless Organizations: Collaborating for Transformation, In: Mind, Culture, and Activity 1-2(14), doi:10.1080/10749030701307663
- François Chiocchio, Daniel Forgues, David Paradis, Ivanka Iordanova (2011): Teamwork in Integrated Design Projects: Understanding the Effects of Trust, Conflict, and Collaboration on Performance, In: Project Management Journal 6(42), doi:10.1002/pmj.20268
- Pooya Jaferian, Kirstie Hawkey, Andreas Sotirakopoulos, Maria Velez-Rojas, Konstantin Beznosov (2014): Heuristics for Evaluating IT Security Management Tools, In: Human–Computer Interaction 4(29), doi:10.1080/07370024.2013.819198